COURSE UNIT TITLE

: GENRE ANALYSIS

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
DIL 6044 GENRE ANALYSIS ELECTIVE 3 0 0 8

Offered By

General Linguistics

Level of Course Unit

Third Cycle Programmes (Doctorate Degree)

Course Coordinator

PROFESSOR KAMIL IŞERI

Offered to

General Linguistics

Course Objective

The aim of this course is to analyze the type of genres from a linguistic perspective and to produce genre-specific texts.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   Explain the concept of genre
2   Explain the difference between genre and text type
3   Explain the preliminaries of genre studies and related approaches
4   Study texts of different settings and present their generic features
5   Study academic and professional texts and present their generic and linguistic patterns
6   Use the method of discourse analysis and write an academic paper paying attention to its genre
7   Define types of metadiscourse

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

None

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 Genre and text type
2 Introduction to genre analysis
3 Register analysis
4 Grammatical-rhetorical analysis
5 Interactional analysis
6 Genre analysis approach
7 Different approaches to genre analyis in different disciplines
8 Midterm
9 Cultural differences in genre analysis
10 Genre studies in linguistics
11 Recent developments in genre analysis
12 Critical genre analysis
13 Academic genre analysis in English for a Specific Purpose
14 Rhetorical genre studies

Recomended or Required Reading

Bonyadi, A. (2012). Genre analysis of media texts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 66 ( 2012 ) 86-96.
Bhatia, V. K. (2013). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. NY: Routledge.
Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Applied genre analysis: a multi-perspective model. Iberica (4), ss. 3-19.
Bhatia, V. K. (1996). Methodological Issues in Genre Analysis. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics no. 16 . ss. 39-59.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writting. London: Continuum International Publishing.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse. English in a Global Context. London: Continuum International Publishing
Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and Researching Writing. Pearson Education Limited
Henry, A. ve Roseberry H. L. (2001). A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: `Letter of Application'. English for Specific Purposes (20) ss.153-167.
Singha, M.K.S, Shamsudinb, S. ve Zaid, Y:H: (2012). Revisiting Genre Analysis: Applying Vijay Bhatia's Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences ( 66 ) 370-379.
Holmes, R. (1997).Genre Analysis, and the Social Sciences: An Investigation of the Structure of Research Article Discussion
Kocaman, A. (2009). Söylem üzerine. Ankara: ODTÜ Yayıncılık.
Özudoğru, M. (2016). Eleştirel Söylemden Eleştirel Okumaya. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık
Sections in Three Disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 321-337, 19
Sözen, E. (2017).Söylem. Istanbul: Profil Kitap
Swales, J. M. ve Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Ann Arbor: The University of Michagen Press.
Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

1. Lecture
2. Presentation
3. Discussion
4. Assignments

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1 MTE MIDTERM EXAM
2 FCG FINAL COURSE GRADE
3 FCGR FINAL COURSE GRADE MTE * 0.40 + FCG* 0.60
4 RST RESIT
5 FCGR FINAL COURSE GRADE (RESIT) MTE * 0.40 + RST* 0.60


*** Resit Exam is Not Administered in Institutions Where Resit is not Applicable.

Further Notes About Assessment Methods

None

Assessment Criteria

Learning outcomes 1-6 will be evaluated via the questions asked in the mid-term and final exams,the assignments/projects, presentations and active participation in classes.

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules

1. 70% class attendance is obligatory.
2. Absence from classes will not be considered as an excuse for late submission of the homework assignments/projects and not participating in class discussions.
3. Cheating and plagiarism attempts in assignments and exams will be evaluated with a '0' (zero) grade.

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

Faculty of Letters B Blok B461.1

Office Hours

Wed. 10-12

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 13 3 39
Student Presentations 12 2 24
Preparations before/after weekly lectures 12 4 48
Preparation for midterm exam 1 10 10
Preparation for final exam 1 10 10
Preparing assignments 3 10 30
Preparing presentations 3 10 30
Final 1 3 3
Midterm 1 3 3
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 197

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6PO.7PO.8PO.9PO.10PO.11PO.12PO.13
LO.15555555
LO.25553555
LO.34334455
LO.44445355
LO.54554455
LO.64353555
LO.75555555555555